2011 was another eventful year in corporate governance. The phone hacking scandal, with its impact and ramification on many other fronts such as privacy intrusion, data protection, personal and corporate ethics, shareholder backlash, scrapped takeover bids and even the collapse of one of Britain’s oldest newspapers, was certainly the most eye-catching.
The final recommendations of the Report produced by the Independent Commission on Banking, (ICB), chaired by Sir John Vickers, have met with a mixed reaction. As expected, the ICB proposals, published on 12 September, have been generally welcomed across the political spectrum but many economists and banking experts fear they could ‘put Britain’s major industry in jeopardy internationally’.
The Bribery Act 2010 received Royal Assent on 8 April 2010 and came into force on 1 July 2011. There has been considerable criticism of the Act and in particular how it will work in practice. To this end, the Ministry of Justice has now issued its final guidance providing details on the ‘adequate procedures’ businesses must employ to provide a defence against prosecution under the Act.
Business Minister Edward Davey and Lynne Featherstone, Minister for Equalities, announced on 16 March 2011, that Lord Davies of Abersoch will develop a business strategy to increase the number of women on the boards of listed companies in the UK.
When the Bribery Act 2010 becomes law next April, British and overseas companies could find themselves restricted in the way they work together. Inappropriate or disproportionate 'entertaining' could be construed as bribery and could lead to massive fines and even imprisonment for the directors of the company providing it. Apart from:
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has now published its revised guidance on Director Disqualification Orders in Competition Cases following a widespread consultation with the legal and business community. It is clear that the OFT will 'actively seek to disqualify' where they uncover evidence of a director being either responsible for, or ought to have known of, competition law breaches at a company. This final revised guidance provides clarification on a number of details of the policy:
In May 2010 the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), published the updated, renamed UK Corporate Governance Code which will apply to financial years beginning on or after 29 June 2010. The change of name was made in order to make the Code’s status as the UK’s recognised corporate governance standard, clearer to foreign investors and to foreign companies listed in the UK. Some of the main points include:
Sir David Walker’s final recommendations on corporate governance in the UK have received a mixed reception. Early indications are that many of the proposals are already being translated into practice and although the report’s remit was primarily aimed at improving governance within the financial services industry, it is likely that many provisions will be applied to the wider corporate community.
Following publication of Sir David Walker’s review of the boards of UK banks, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is consulting on possible reform to the governance of all UK companies. It is seeking comments on the annual re-election of company chairmen and succession planning for boards, and whether or how investors should play a more active role.
The piecemeal implementation of the Companies Act 2006 (the Act) draws to a close in October 2009. The final parts deal mainly with incorporation formalities, constitutional documents, share capital issues and the registration and submission of forms to the Registrar of Companies.
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has recently issued a consultation paper on Going Concern and Financial Reporting. The paper has been produced on the assumption that guidance for directors and disclosure requirements should continue to exist and therefore includes proposals to revise the guidance for directors of listed companies which was originally published in November 1994 and since then has not been subject to any revision.
Appointment of Directors Section 155 of CA 2006 requires that, with effect from 1 October 2008, every company must have at least one director who is a ‘natural person’, ie not a corporate body. The Government has introduced a grace period for those companies that did not have a natural person as a director on the date the CA 2006 received Royal Assent (8 November 2006).
Privacy Policy | Site Map | Terms & Conditions | Copyright | Legal Disclaimer | David Venus © 2010